Model comparisons
Claude Opus 5.5 vs Opus 5: Should You Upgrade?
Migration guide comparing Claude Opus 5.5 with Opus 5: $4/$20 vs $5/$25, Anthropic's reported 40% saving, breaking changes, and Terminal-Bench 66.4%.
Updated
In short
Yes, for nearly every Opus 5 workload. Opus 5.5 costs $4 per million input tokens and $20 per million output tokens against Opus 5's $5 and $25, and cache reads drop from $0.50 to $0.20. Anthropic reports output generation more than 30% faster and about 40% lower cost on typical workloads at default settings, and its launch table scores Opus 5.5 above Opus 5 on every benchmark listed. Opus 5 is now a legacy model that gets no further updates. Before switching an API integration, check Anthropic's breaking changes, two of which make existing requests fail: Opus 5.5 always thinks, so requests that turn thinking off fail, and forced tool use returns an error.
On this page5
Both keep a 1M-token window and 128K tokens of output
Opus 5 was released on July 24, 2026 and Opus 5.5 on September 22, 2026. Both have a 1M-token context window and a 128K-token output limit, or up to 300K on the Batch API with the output-300k-2026-03-24 beta header, so neither limit is a reason to move or to stay. The knowledge cutoff moves from May 2026 to June 2026.
Opus 5 stays available on the API as a legacy model, with retirement not sooner than July 24, 2027. Anthropic says a legacy model "will no longer receive updates and may be deprecated in the future", and its Opus 5 page tells users to "consider migrating to Claude Opus 5.5".
Every Opus 5.5 rate is lower, cache reads most of all
Prices are per million tokens on Anthropic's API. Input, output and cache writes fall by 20%. Cache reads fall by 60%, which matters most for agents that resend the same repository or document on every turn.
| Opus 5 | Opus 5.5 |
|---|---|---|
Input | $5 | $4 |
Output | $25 | $20 |
5-minute cache write | $6.25 | $5 |
1-hour cache write | $10 | $8 |
Cache read | $0.50 | $0.20 |
Batch input / output | $2.50 / $12.50 | $2 / $10 |
Fast mode input / output | $10 / $50 | $8 / $40 |
As an illustration, take one agent turn that reads 100K tokens from the cache, adds 10K new input tokens and writes 5K output tokens. On Opus 5 it costs $0.05 + $0.05 + $0.125 = $0.225. On Opus 5.5 it costs $0.02 + $0.04 + $0.10 = $0.16, about 29% less. Anthropic's 40% figure is measured at default settings, where Opus 5.5 also runs at a lower default effort. Customers quoted in its announcement report fewer output tokens, such as Factory's 20 to 25% fewer, so part of that saving likely comes from shorter runs at the lower default. If you set effort back to high, your saving may sit closer to the list-price difference.
Fast mode gives up to 2.5 times the output speed on both models at twice the standard price. It is a research preview on Anthropic's own API that needs access approval, and it is not offered on Bedrock, Google Cloud or Microsoft Foundry or with the Batch API. In Claude Code on a subscription it runs on usage credits only.
Anthropic's launch table: Opus 5.5 ahead on every row
These figures come from Anthropic's Opus 5.5 announcement, which ran Opus 5.5 at max effort except on Terminal-Bench 4.0 (xhigh). The table does not state Opus 5's setting. The largest gains are on agentic terminal and automation work.
Benchmark (Anthropic's figures) | Opus 5 | Opus 5.5 |
|---|---|---|
Terminal-Bench 4.0 | 52.3 | 66.4 |
Terminal-Bench-Science 0.1 | 29.0 | 58.7 |
AutomationBench | 26.9 | 40.0 |
CursorBench 4.0 | 46.6 | 57.8 |
FrontierCode v1.1 Main | 48.0 | 54.4 |
OSWorld 2.1 partial | 74.0 | 81.8 |
GDPval-AA v2.1 (Elo) | 1708 | 1846 |
Neither announcement states a SWE-bench Verified or GPQA Diamond score in its text, and the Opus 5 announcement shows its scores only as chart images. Treat such figures for this pair as unsourced unless they cite Anthropic.
What to change when you switch to claude-opus-5-5
- Thinking cannot be turned off. On Opus 5 you could disable thinking at
higheffort or below. On Opus 5.5,thinking: {"type": "disabled"}returns a 400 error at every effort level, so remove it. - Forced tool use returns an error. Anthropic lists it among the breaking changes from Opus 5. Rewrite calls that force a particular tool before you switch them.
- The default effort is one level lower. Opus 5 defaults to
highand Opus 5.5 tomedium, so a request without an effort setting "runs one level lower". Seteffortexplicitly while you compare the two models. - Leave room for thinking in
max_tokens. Thinking tokens count towardmax_tokensand are billed as output, even when the thinking text isn't returned. - Unchanged: both models already reject
budget_tokens, and any non-defaulttemperature,top_portop_k, with a 400 error, so a working Opus 5 request needs no change there.
Keep Opus 5 only while those calls are rewritten
Opus 5 is worth keeping for calls that switch thinking off for speed, and for pipelines that depend on forced tool use, until they are rewritten. If a fast answer without thinking is the point, Sonnet 5.5 can skip up-front thinking with between_tools at high effort or below, at $2 input and $10 output per million tokens; Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs Opus 5.5 covers that trade. You have until at least July 24, 2027.
In Claude Code there is nothing to migrate: it uses Opus 5.5 by default on Pro, Max, Team, Enterprise and the API, and Anthropic raised five-hour limits on Pro, Max, Team and seat-based Enterprise when Opus 5.5 launched. For the step above Opus 5.5, see Claude Opus 5.5 vs Fable 5.2 vs Sonnet 5.5.
Edited byRick Finch
Official sources
Editorial guidance grounded in official product sources.
- Claude official site
- Claude plans and pricing
- Home | Claude Help Center
- Anthropic: Introducing Claude Opus 4.8
- Claude Platform Docs: API pricing
- Anthropic: Introducing Claude Opus 5
- Claude Platform Docs: What’s new in Claude Opus 5
- Claude Platform Docs: What’s new in Claude Opus 4.8
Show all 18 sources
- Claude Platform Docs: Migration guide
- Claude Platform Docs: Models overview
- Claude Platform Docs: Prompting Claude Opus 5
- Claude Platform Docs: Effort
- Claude Platform Docs: Prompt caching
- Claude Platform Docs: Fast mode
- Claude Platform Docs: Model deprecations
- Claude Platform release notes
- Introducing Claude Opus 5.5
- Introducing Claude Sonnet 5.5
FAQ
Common questions
Is Claude Opus 5.5 worth upgrading to from Opus 5?
Yes. Anthropic reduced pricing to $4.00 per million input tokens and $20.00 per million output tokens (down from $5/$25) and reports 66.4% on Terminal-Bench 4.0 against 52.3% for Opus 5. Its 40% lower-cost figure is for typical workloads at default settings, where Opus 5.5 also runs at a lower default effort.
Do Claude Opus 5.5 and Opus 5 have the same context and output limits?
Yes for standard API limits: both support a 1M-token context window and up to 128k output tokens. Opus 5.5 uses adaptive thinking to manage token consumption without requiring manual budget calculations.
Can an Opus 5 integration upgrade simply by updating the model ID?
Not quite. The model ID is claude-opus-5-5, but two breaking changes can make existing requests fail: disabling thinking returns a 400 error, and forced tool use returns an error. Opus 5.5 also defaults to medium effort, one level below Opus 5.
How does Adaptive Thinking work in Opus 5.5?
Adaptive thinking is always on in Opus 5.5 and can't be turned off. The effort parameter (low, medium, high, xhigh, max; default medium) is the main control, and Anthropic treats it as a behavioral signal, not a strict token budget.
How do prompt caching and Fast mode pricing change with Opus 5.5?
Prompt caching costs $0.20 per million cached input tokens on Opus 5.5, a 95% discount on its $4 input price ($0.50 on Opus 5). Fast mode runs at twice Opus 5.5's standard rates ($8 input / $40 output per million tokens), while Opus 5 Fast mode costs $10 / $50.
When should an organization temporarily remain on Opus 5?
Only for calls that turn thinking off for speed or depend on forced tool use, until they are rewritten; both fail on Opus 5.5. Opus 5 stays available until at least July 24, 2027. For new development, Opus 5.5 is cheaper and leads on every benchmark in Anthropic's launch table.
Next steps
Open both sides of the distinction
- Tool profileReview Claude CodeUse the Claude Code profile next to review how Opus 5.5's 66.4% Terminal-Bench accuracy powers terminal workflows.
- Tool profileReview ClaudeUse the Claude profile next to review app availability, supported surfaces, and canonical product context before changing a paid-plan workflow.