Codex
- Autonomous task execution
- From $8/mo + usage
Comparison
Choose Codex when the task should become a reviewed change set; choose Devin Desktop when the IDE experience should stay in control.
Updated October 21, 2026
Codex
Devin Desktop
Compare the strongest case for each tool and focus on the requirements that matter most to your workflow.
Codex should stay the baseline when autonomous task execution and primary buying job matter most to the purchase.
Devin Desktop becomes the sharper call when editor experience and repository-scale context outweigh the baseline strengths.
Find the situation closest to yours, then check the condition that should send you to the other tool.
Reconsider if
Reconsider if
Every criterion we compared, grouped by what it affects, with both answers and the verdict for each. Tap a criterion to read both answers.
| Criterion | Codex | Devin Desktop | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| WorkflowCodex leads5 criteriaHow work actually gets done day to day once you are inside the product. | |||
| Autonomous task execution | Built for background and parallel work across app, CLI, IDE, Codex Cloud, worktrees, and PR workflows | Devin Local, the default agent since Windsurf became Devin Desktop on 2026-06-02 and the only one since Cascade was removed on 2026-09-08, handles local agent work, and Devin Cloud takes delegated tasks from the same board. | Codex |
| Debugging and tests | Strong fit when the agent should inspect files, run commands, fix failures, produce diffs, and request a separate review pass | Strong fit when debugging happens inside the editor with linter integration, terminal commands, browser previews, and optional Devin handoff | Tie |
| Primary buying job | Autonomous coding agent for repo-level tasks, diffs, command execution, cloud delegation, and code review | AI-native IDE for coding flow, completions, Devin Local agent work, previews, and editor-local context | Codex |
| Solo developer fit | Best when one developer wants to delegate complete issues, tests, refactors, reviews, and repeatable scripts across repositories | Best when one developer wants a faster daily IDE with completions, context-aware chat, previews, and model switching in one workspace | Tie |
| Frontend and UI feedback loop | Can use browser and app workflows, but visual iteration is not as natively tied to a full IDE canvas | Browser previews carried over from Windsurf let developers inspect local web apps and send page context back to the agent inside the editor. | Devin Desktop |
| PricingTied1 criterionPlan structure, entry cost, and where the economics start to change. | |||
| Pricing predictability | Plan inclusion is simple, but heavy work depends on credits, token mix, model choice, speed settings, cloud use, and API-key usage | Published plan prices are easier to anchor, but quotas, token use, model choice, extra usage, and Devin consumption still affect real cost | Tie |
| IntegrationsTied1 criterionHow well each tool fits into the rest of your stack and connected apps. | |||
| Extensibility and instructions | AGENTS.md, Skills, plugins, MCP, hooks, config files, and automation tools help Codex follow repository and team standards | Rules, AGENTS.md, Skills, MCP and enterprise policies customize Devin Local and the IDE; Cascade workflows and memories migrate to skills | Tie |
| CollaborationCodex leads1 criterionShared work, team workflows, handoffs, and multi-user coordination. | |||
| Collaboration workflow | Cloud tasks, GitHub code review, PR-focused review comments, repository guidance, Slack and Linear integrations support team delegation | Team workflows center on shared IDE usage, Agent Command Center, Spaces, analytics, admin controls, and enterprise policies | Codex |
| GovernanceTied1 criterionAdmin control, compliance posture, permissions, and policy management. | |||
| Team governance | Business and Enterprise paths add security controls, SCIM, domain verification, RBAC, audit logs, Compliance API, and usage monitoring | Teams and Enterprise paths add centralized billing, analytics, SSO, RBAC, enterprise policies, and admin controls | Tie |
| PlatformDevin Desktop leads2 criteriaModel reach, device support, deployment flexibility, and platform availability. | |||
| Editor experience | Works beside existing editors through the IDE extension, but the primary product is still the agent workflow | Full IDE, backwards-compatible with Windsurf and VS Code extensions, with unlimited Tab completions, inline edits and the Agent Command Center as the default screen. | Devin Desktop |
| Model and provider flexibility | Best with OpenAI's supported Codex models, with availability varying by plan, surface, and configuration | Pro includes frontier models from OpenAI, Anthropic, Google and SpaceXAI plus open-source models and Cognition's SWE-2, giving stronger in-IDE provider flexibility. | Devin Desktop |
| PerformanceDevin Desktop leads1 criterionSpeed, reliability, quality, and responsiveness under real usage. | |||
| Repository-scale context | Uses project folders, configured cloud environments, AGENTS.md guidance, Skills, worktrees, and model context inside agent threads | Indexes the local codebase, uses RAG-style retrieval, pinned context, open-file state, and Fast Context with SWE-grep retrieval | Devin Desktop |
| Other differencesCodex leads1 criterionAdditional differences that still matter once the core decision is clear. | |||
| Best first trial | Ask Codex to fix a real issue, run tests, produce a minimal diff, and then perform a separate code review | Use Devin Desktop for the same task inside the IDE with Tab, Devin Local, terminal help, previews and any Devin Cloud handoff. | Codex |
Analysis
See where each tool fits better and how pricing or workflow needs can change the choice.
Analysis note
Focus on the exceptions, pricing differences, and workflow constraints that could change the recommendation.
This comparison changed shape in 2026. On June 2, 2026, Cognition renamed Windsurf as Devin Desktop and made an Agent Command Center, a board for managing local and cloud agents, the default screen, with the full Windsurf IDE still behind it. Devin Local, rewritten in Rust, replaced Cascade as the built-in local agent, and the legacy Cascade agent was removed on September 8, 2026, in version 3.9.19. Windsurf plans, pricing, settings and extensions carried over unchanged. windsurf.com now redirects to Devin's site. Windsurf is now Devin Desktop.
OpenAI Codex is still an agent-first product that runs in the ChatGPT desktop app, the Codex CLI, an IDE extension, the web, iOS and Codex Cloud. Devin Desktop can even host Codex as a third-party agent through the Agent Client Protocol (ACP), so the two are no longer strictly either-or.
Choose Codex when you want an OpenAI agent that turns tasks into reviewed diffs across terminal, IDE and cloud, paid for by a ChatGPT plan you may already have. Choose Devin Desktop when you want the IDE itself as the center of your workflow, with Tab completions, a choice of frontier models from several vendors, Devin agents on your laptop and in the cloud, and a board for supervising many agents at once.
Plan details below come from OpenAI's Codex pricing page and Devin's pricing page, checked on September 30, 2026. Codex pricing, Devin pricing.
Codex's models are GPT-6.1 Sol, released September 29, 2026 and listed on Plus and Pro, GPT-6 Sol, GPT-6 Astra for the hardest problems, and GPT-6 Luna for light tasks. Plus and above include cloud tasks, automatic GitHub code review and Slack and Linear integrations. Codex follows repository guidance in AGENTS.md files and supports skills, plugins, MCP servers, subagents, scheduled tasks and built-in Git tools. Codex models.
Devin Desktop is a full IDE, backwards-compatible with Windsurf and VS Code extensions, keybindings and language servers. Its unlimited Tab completions and inline edits are included on every plan, even Free. Devin Local is the built-in agent, which Cognition says is up to 30% more token-efficient than Cascade and supports subagents. Spaces group sessions, pull requests, files and context so several agents can share them. The same Devin agent also runs as Devin Cloud on its own machine, as the Devin CLI and as Devin Review for code review. Paid plans include frontier models from OpenAI, Anthropic, Google and SpaceXAI plus open-source models, and Pro includes free use of Cognition's own SWE-2 model.
The key workflow difference is where you sit. In Codex, you assign a task and review the result. In Devin Desktop, you work in the editor while agents run beside you, and the board shows every local and cloud session in one view.
Capability | Codex | Devin Desktop |
|---|---|---|
Product type | Agent across app, CLI, IDE extension, web, iOS and cloud | Full IDE with an agent manager built in |
Built-in agent | Codex with GPT-6.1 Sol, GPT-6 Sol, Astra and Luna | Devin Local (successor to Cascade), plus Devin Cloud, CLI and Review |
Completions | Not included as an editor feature | Unlimited Tab completions and inline edits on every plan |
Third-party agents | Not applicable | Codex, Claude Agent, OpenCode and other ACP agents |
Models | OpenAI models | OpenAI, Anthropic, Google, SpaceXAI and open-source models; free SWE-2 on Pro |
Code review | GitHub PR review from Plus | Devin Review on diffs |
Integrations | GitHub, Slack, Linear | Slack and Teams, Linear and Jira, GitHub, GitLab and Bitbucket |
Tier | Codex (through ChatGPT) | Devin Desktop |
|---|---|---|
Free | $0: limited Codex with GPT-6 Luna in the desktop app | $0: light agent quota, limited models, unlimited Tab and inline edits |
Entry | Go $8: light Codex tasks with GPT-6 Luna | — |
Individual | Plus $20: full Codex on web, CLI, IDE and iOS; cloud review; GPT-6 Sol and Luna | Pro $20: higher quotas, all frontier models, Devin Cloud, extra usage at API prices |
Power user | Pro from $100 ($100, $200 or $500 tiers) | Max $200: significantly higher quotas |
Team | Business from $25 per seat monthly or $20 annual | Teams: $40 per full developer seat with an $80 monthly minimum, up to 200 users |
Enterprise | Enterprise and Edu: flexible credit pricing available | Enterprise: SAML/OIDC SSO, VPC deployment, dedicated account team |
Both products meter usage rather than selling unlimited agents. Codex estimates local messages per five hours on Plus: about 15 to 160 with GPT-6.1 Sol, 15 to 150 with GPT-6 Sol, 5 to 45 with GPT-6 Astra and 350 to 3,000 with GPT-6 Luna. Pro plans currently have no five-hour limit. After the included allowance, Plus and Pro users can buy credits; GPT-6.1 Sol costs 50 credits per million input tokens, 2.5 per million cached and 250 per million output. Fast mode uses included usage at 2.5 times the Standard rate.
Devin Desktop's paid quotas refresh daily and weekly. Once you go past them, extra usage is billed at the chosen model's API price. Cost per message depends on the model, the size of the task and the reasoning required, and Cognition recommends smaller models for routine work to stretch the quota.
Delegated, reviewable work. Codex is built to take an issue, work in a local checkout, a Git worktree or a cloud environment, run the tests and return a diff, then review pull requests on GitHub. That loop works without adopting a new editor.
Surfaces beyond the IDE. The same agent runs in the terminal, in an existing editor through the IDE extension, on the web, on iOS and in Slack or Linear. Teams that do not want to standardize everyone on one editor can still standardize on one agent.
Value if you already pay for ChatGPT. Plus at $20 already includes Codex with cloud review, so for an existing subscriber the marginal cost of trying Codex is zero. Business and Enterprise workspaces add workspace management, cloud-managed policies and admin analytics.
The editor is the product. Unlimited Tab completions and inline edits on every plan, including Free, make Devin Desktop a strong daily IDE even before agents come in. Codex's IDE extension sits inside someone else's editor.
Model choice. Devin Desktop Pro includes frontier models from several vendors, not only OpenAI's. Developers can pick Claude for one task, GPT for another and an open-source model for cheap routine work, then buy extra usage at API prices.
Many agents in one place. The Agent Command Center shows local and cloud sessions on one board, and ACP support means Codex, Claude Agent, OpenCode and in-house agents appear beside Devin. For an engineer who runs several agents a day, that supervision layer is the main reason to choose Devin Desktop.
Admin tools in the self-serve team plan. Teams costs $40 per full developer seat with an $80 monthly minimum, and includes an admin dashboard, analytics and centralized billing for up to 200 users.
A solo developer who already pays for ChatGPT Plus. Codex adds nothing to the bill, including cloud tasks and GitHub review. Adding Devin Desktop Pro costs another $20 a month; Devin Desktop Free is enough to test whether its IDE and unlimited Tab completions are worth that.
A developer who wants one tool for editing and agents. Devin Desktop Pro at $20 covers the IDE, Devin Local, Devin Cloud and frontier models from several vendors, with extra usage at API prices. The same person on Codex would still need an editor, and Codex Plus costs the same $20.
A 20-developer team. Devin Desktop Teams costs 20 × $40 = $800 a month, well past the $80 minimum. ChatGPT Business costs 20 × $25 = $500 month-to-month, or $400 billed annually, and includes Codex plus the rest of ChatGPT. Devin's price includes the IDE and agent platform for every seat; ChatGPT Business includes the wider assistant. Teams that already run ChatGPT Business may add Devin Desktop only for the engineers who want its editor.
Heavy agent users. Codex's Pro tiers at $100, $200 and $500 currently have no five-hour limit, and Devin Desktop Max at $200 offers significantly higher quotas than Pro. At that level, compare with a two-week trial on real work, because both vendors describe usage in quotas rather than fixed task counts.
Whichever you pick, watch the model mix. On Codex, routing routine tasks to GPT-6.1 Sol instead of GPT-6 Astra is the main way to stretch an allowance. On Devin Desktop, Cognition recommends smaller models for routine tasks, and Pro's free use of SWE-2 makes it a cheap default for everyday agent work.
If your main requirement is… | Start with | Why |
|---|---|---|
Assigning tasks and reviewing diffs | Codex | Agent-first loop across local, worktree and cloud |
GitHub PR review on a personal plan | Codex | Included from ChatGPT Plus |
An existing ChatGPT subscription | Codex | Codex is already included from Free upward |
A full AI IDE with unlimited completions | Devin Desktop | Tab and inline edits are unlimited on every plan |
Models from several vendors in one editor | Devin Desktop | Pro includes OpenAI, Anthropic, Google and other models |
Supervising several agents at once | Devin Desktop | Agent Command Center with ACP support, including Codex |
Cheapest routine agent work on OpenAI models | Codex | GPT-6.1 Sol at 50/2.5/250 credits per million tokens |
Because Devin Desktop supports ACP, a team can keep Devin Desktop as the editor and run Codex as one of its agents, while also using Codex Cloud and GitHub review from a ChatGPT plan. That split is sensible when developers like the IDE but the organization already standardizes on OpenAI models for agent work.
To decide, run the same two tasks in each product on one repository: a bug fix with a failing test, and a small feature that touches several files. Record setup time, retries, review effort, test results and the usage shown in each dashboard. Choose Codex if assigning and reviewing work is the bottleneck, and Devin Desktop if the editor and agent supervision are.
Existing Windsurf users already have Devin Desktop: it arrived as an over-the-air update that kept each account's plan, pricing, settings and extensions, though Cascade memories and workflows had to become skills when Cascade was removed. The main decision is whether to keep paying for the IDE, add Codex, or run both through ACP. Revisit the choice if Pro's free SWE-2 use ends, because routine-task costs on Devin Desktop would change then.
Editorial guidance grounded in official product sources.
FAQ
Codex is the stronger default for autonomous coding work because it is designed to take repository tasks through planning, editing, command execution, diff review, cloud delegation, and code review. Devin Desktop can delegate cloud work to Devin Cloud, but its strongest everyday surface is still the IDE.
Choose Devin Desktop when the main goal is a better daily editor: unlimited Tab completions, inline edits, the Devin Local agent, terminal help, previews and models from several vendors inside one IDE. It is the better fit when the editor experience is the product being bought.
It depends on the task shape. Devin Desktop has a strong IDE-native context story with indexed codebases, RAG-style retrieval, pinned context, and Fast Context. Codex is stronger when large-repo context must turn into an autonomous, tested, reviewable change set across worktrees or cloud tasks.
Compare the unit that will constrain real work. Codex is tied to ChatGPT plans, credits, token use, models, speed, cloud tasks, and API-key usage. Devin Desktop has clearer editor-seat plans, but quota, token use, model selection, extra usage, and Devin sessions can still change the real cost.
Yes. A team can use Devin Desktop as the daily IDE while using Codex for independent repo tasks, code review, or cloud delegation. The decision is not whether they can coexist; it is which product should be the default purchase and workflow owner.
Check each product's profile, pricing and alternatives before you commit.
AI Coding Assistants
OpenAI’s software engineering agent with GPT-6 Astra, GPT-6.1 Sol workhorse integration, and terminal workflows.
Last verified October 19, 2026
AI Coding Assistants
Cognition's agentic IDE for local and cloud coding workflows.
Last verified October 19, 2026