Comparison

OpenAI Codex vs Devin Desktop

Choose Codex when the task should become a reviewed change set; choose Devin Desktop when the IDE experience should stay in control.

Updated October 21, 2026

codex
Default pick

Codex

Stronger on
Autonomous task execution
Price
From $8/mo + usage
Devin Desktop
Specialist fit

Devin Desktop

Stronger on
Editor experience
Price
From $20/mo + usage

What can change the recommendation

Compare the strongest case for each tool and focus on the requirements that matter most to your workflow.

Start with Codex

Codex should stay the baseline when autonomous task execution and primary buying job matter most to the purchase.

Autonomous task execution
Built for background and parallel work across app, CLI, IDE, Codex Cloud, worktrees, and PR workflows
Primary buying job
Autonomous coding agent for repo-level tasks, diffs, command execution, cloud delegation, and code review

When to choose Devin Desktop

Devin Desktop becomes the sharper call when editor experience and repository-scale context outweigh the baseline strengths.

Editor experience
Full IDE, backwards-compatible with Windsurf and VS Code extensions, with unlimited Tab completions, inline edits and the Agent Command Center as the default screen.
Repository-scale context
Indexes the local codebase, uses RAG-style retrieval, pinned context, open-file state, and Fast Context with SWE-grep retrieval

Who should choose Codex or Devin Desktop?

Find the situation closest to yours, then check the condition that should send you to the other tool.

Choose Codex if

  • You want an agent to handle repo-scale work such as bug fixes, migrations, refactors, tests, review, and pull-request-ready diffs.
  • You need the same coding agent across desktop app, terminal, IDE extension, cloud delegation, GitHub review, and automation surfaces.

Reconsider if

  • Your main productivity gap is IDE-local coding: completions, inline edits, terminal help, browser previews, and current-file awareness.

Choose Devin Desktop if

  • You want the AI workflow centered inside an IDE with Devin Local, unlimited Tab completions, inline edits, terminal help and an Agent Command Center for local and cloud agents.
  • Current-file context, a choice of models from several vendors and supervising several agents at once matter more than independent agent throughput.

Reconsider if

  • You do not want to standardize on Devin Desktop as the primary editor or migrate developer settings, extensions, and daily workflow into it.

Compare the tradeoffs

Every criterion we compared, grouped by what it affects, with both answers and the verdict for each. Tap a criterion to read both answers.

Codex ahead
4
Devin Desktop ahead
4
Tied
5

Workflow

Codex leads5 criteria
  • Autonomous task executionCodex
    Codex
    Built for background and parallel work across app, CLI, IDE, Codex Cloud, worktrees, and PR workflows
    Devin Desktop
    Devin Local, the default agent since Windsurf became Devin Desktop on 2026-06-02 and the only one since Cascade was removed on 2026-09-08, handles local agent work, and Devin Cloud takes delegated tasks from the same board.
  • Debugging and testsTie
    Codex
    Strong fit when the agent should inspect files, run commands, fix failures, produce diffs, and request a separate review pass
    Devin Desktop
    Strong fit when debugging happens inside the editor with linter integration, terminal commands, browser previews, and optional Devin handoff
  • Primary buying jobCodex
    Codex
    Autonomous coding agent for repo-level tasks, diffs, command execution, cloud delegation, and code review
    Devin Desktop
    AI-native IDE for coding flow, completions, Devin Local agent work, previews, and editor-local context
  • Solo developer fitTie
    Codex
    Best when one developer wants to delegate complete issues, tests, refactors, reviews, and repeatable scripts across repositories
    Devin Desktop
    Best when one developer wants a faster daily IDE with completions, context-aware chat, previews, and model switching in one workspace
  • Frontend and UI feedback loopDevin Desktop
    Codex
    Can use browser and app workflows, but visual iteration is not as natively tied to a full IDE canvas
    Devin Desktop
    Browser previews carried over from Windsurf let developers inspect local web apps and send page context back to the agent inside the editor.

Pricing

Tied1 criterion
  • Pricing predictabilityTie
    Codex
    Plan inclusion is simple, but heavy work depends on credits, token mix, model choice, speed settings, cloud use, and API-key usage
    Devin Desktop
    Published plan prices are easier to anchor, but quotas, token use, model choice, extra usage, and Devin consumption still affect real cost

Integrations

Tied1 criterion
  • Extensibility and instructionsTie
    Codex
    AGENTS.md, Skills, plugins, MCP, hooks, config files, and automation tools help Codex follow repository and team standards
    Devin Desktop
    Rules, AGENTS.md, Skills, MCP and enterprise policies customize Devin Local and the IDE; Cascade workflows and memories migrate to skills

Collaboration

Codex leads1 criterion
  • Collaboration workflowCodex
    Codex
    Cloud tasks, GitHub code review, PR-focused review comments, repository guidance, Slack and Linear integrations support team delegation
    Devin Desktop
    Team workflows center on shared IDE usage, Agent Command Center, Spaces, analytics, admin controls, and enterprise policies

Governance

Tied1 criterion
  • Team governanceTie
    Codex
    Business and Enterprise paths add security controls, SCIM, domain verification, RBAC, audit logs, Compliance API, and usage monitoring
    Devin Desktop
    Teams and Enterprise paths add centralized billing, analytics, SSO, RBAC, enterprise policies, and admin controls

Platform

Devin Desktop leads2 criteria
  • Editor experienceDevin Desktop
    Codex
    Works beside existing editors through the IDE extension, but the primary product is still the agent workflow
    Devin Desktop
    Full IDE, backwards-compatible with Windsurf and VS Code extensions, with unlimited Tab completions, inline edits and the Agent Command Center as the default screen.
  • Model and provider flexibilityDevin Desktop
    Codex
    Best with OpenAI's supported Codex models, with availability varying by plan, surface, and configuration
    Devin Desktop
    Pro includes frontier models from OpenAI, Anthropic, Google and SpaceXAI plus open-source models and Cognition's SWE-2, giving stronger in-IDE provider flexibility.

Performance

Devin Desktop leads1 criterion
  • Repository-scale contextDevin Desktop
    Codex
    Uses project folders, configured cloud environments, AGENTS.md guidance, Skills, worktrees, and model context inside agent threads
    Devin Desktop
    Indexes the local codebase, uses RAG-style retrieval, pinned context, open-file state, and Fast Context with SWE-grep retrieval

Other differences

Codex leads1 criterion
  • Best first trialCodex
    Codex
    Ask Codex to fix a real issue, run tests, produce a minimal diff, and then perform a separate code review
    Devin Desktop
    Use Devin Desktop for the same task inside the IDE with Tab, Devin Local, terminal help, previews and any Devin Cloud handoff.

Analysis

Codex vs Devin Desktop, in depth

See where each tool fits better and how pricing or workflow needs can change the choice.

Analysis note

Focus on the exceptions, pricing differences, and workflow constraints that could change the recommendation.

The Short Answer

This comparison changed shape in 2026. On June 2, 2026, Cognition renamed Windsurf as Devin Desktop and made an Agent Command Center, a board for managing local and cloud agents, the default screen, with the full Windsurf IDE still behind it. Devin Local, rewritten in Rust, replaced Cascade as the built-in local agent, and the legacy Cascade agent was removed on September 8, 2026, in version 3.9.19. Windsurf plans, pricing, settings and extensions carried over unchanged. windsurf.com now redirects to Devin's site. Windsurf is now Devin Desktop.

OpenAI Codex is still an agent-first product that runs in the ChatGPT desktop app, the Codex CLI, an IDE extension, the web, iOS and Codex Cloud. Devin Desktop can even host Codex as a third-party agent through the Agent Client Protocol (ACP), so the two are no longer strictly either-or.

Choose Codex when you want an OpenAI agent that turns tasks into reviewed diffs across terminal, IDE and cloud, paid for by a ChatGPT plan you may already have. Choose Devin Desktop when you want the IDE itself as the center of your workflow, with Tab completions, a choice of frontier models from several vendors, Devin agents on your laptop and in the cloud, and a board for supervising many agents at once.

Plan details below come from OpenAI's Codex pricing page and Devin's pricing page, checked on September 30, 2026. Codex pricing, Devin pricing.

What Each Product Is Today

Codex's models are GPT-6.1 Sol, released September 29, 2026 and listed on Plus and Pro, GPT-6 Sol, GPT-6 Astra for the hardest problems, and GPT-6 Luna for light tasks. Plus and above include cloud tasks, automatic GitHub code review and Slack and Linear integrations. Codex follows repository guidance in AGENTS.md files and supports skills, plugins, MCP servers, subagents, scheduled tasks and built-in Git tools. Codex models.

Devin Desktop is a full IDE, backwards-compatible with Windsurf and VS Code extensions, keybindings and language servers. Its unlimited Tab completions and inline edits are included on every plan, even Free. Devin Local is the built-in agent, which Cognition says is up to 30% more token-efficient than Cascade and supports subagents. Spaces group sessions, pull requests, files and context so several agents can share them. The same Devin agent also runs as Devin Cloud on its own machine, as the Devin CLI and as Devin Review for code review. Paid plans include frontier models from OpenAI, Anthropic, Google and SpaceXAI plus open-source models, and Pro includes free use of Cognition's own SWE-2 model.

The key workflow difference is where you sit. In Codex, you assign a task and review the result. In Devin Desktop, you work in the editor while agents run beside you, and the board shows every local and cloud session in one view.

Capability

Codex

Devin Desktop

Product type

Agent across app, CLI, IDE extension, web, iOS and cloud

Full IDE with an agent manager built in

Built-in agent

Codex with GPT-6.1 Sol, GPT-6 Sol, Astra and Luna

Devin Local (successor to Cascade), plus Devin Cloud, CLI and Review

Completions

Not included as an editor feature

Unlimited Tab completions and inline edits on every plan

Third-party agents

Not applicable

Codex, Claude Agent, OpenCode and other ACP agents

Models

OpenAI models

OpenAI, Anthropic, Google, SpaceXAI and open-source models; free SWE-2 on Pro

Code review

GitHub PR review from Plus

Devin Review on diffs

Integrations

GitHub, Slack, Linear

Slack and Teams, Linear and Jira, GitHub, GitLab and Bitbucket

Plans and Prices

Tier

Codex (through ChatGPT)

Devin Desktop

Free

$0: limited Codex with GPT-6 Luna in the desktop app

$0: light agent quota, limited models, unlimited Tab and inline edits

Entry

Go $8: light Codex tasks with GPT-6 Luna

—

Individual

Plus $20: full Codex on web, CLI, IDE and iOS; cloud review; GPT-6 Sol and Luna

Pro $20: higher quotas, all frontier models, Devin Cloud, extra usage at API prices

Power user

Pro from $100 ($100, $200 or $500 tiers)

Max $200: significantly higher quotas

Team

Business from $25 per seat monthly or $20 annual

Teams: $40 per full developer seat with an $80 monthly minimum, up to 200 users

Enterprise

Enterprise and Edu: flexible credit pricing available

Enterprise: SAML/OIDC SSO, VPC deployment, dedicated account team

Both products meter usage rather than selling unlimited agents. Codex estimates local messages per five hours on Plus: about 15 to 160 with GPT-6.1 Sol, 15 to 150 with GPT-6 Sol, 5 to 45 with GPT-6 Astra and 350 to 3,000 with GPT-6 Luna. Pro plans currently have no five-hour limit. After the included allowance, Plus and Pro users can buy credits; GPT-6.1 Sol costs 50 credits per million input tokens, 2.5 per million cached and 250 per million output. Fast mode uses included usage at 2.5 times the Standard rate.

Devin Desktop's paid quotas refresh daily and weekly. Once you go past them, extra usage is billed at the chosen model's API price. Cost per message depends on the model, the size of the task and the reasoning required, and Cognition recommends smaller models for routine work to stretch the quota.

Where Codex Wins

Delegated, reviewable work. Codex is built to take an issue, work in a local checkout, a Git worktree or a cloud environment, run the tests and return a diff, then review pull requests on GitHub. That loop works without adopting a new editor.

Surfaces beyond the IDE. The same agent runs in the terminal, in an existing editor through the IDE extension, on the web, on iOS and in Slack or Linear. Teams that do not want to standardize everyone on one editor can still standardize on one agent.

Value if you already pay for ChatGPT. Plus at $20 already includes Codex with cloud review, so for an existing subscriber the marginal cost of trying Codex is zero. Business and Enterprise workspaces add workspace management, cloud-managed policies and admin analytics.

Where Devin Desktop Wins

The editor is the product. Unlimited Tab completions and inline edits on every plan, including Free, make Devin Desktop a strong daily IDE even before agents come in. Codex's IDE extension sits inside someone else's editor.

Model choice. Devin Desktop Pro includes frontier models from several vendors, not only OpenAI's. Developers can pick Claude for one task, GPT for another and an open-source model for cheap routine work, then buy extra usage at API prices.

Many agents in one place. The Agent Command Center shows local and cloud sessions on one board, and ACP support means Codex, Claude Agent, OpenCode and in-house agents appear beside Devin. For an engineer who runs several agents a day, that supervision layer is the main reason to choose Devin Desktop.

Admin tools in the self-serve team plan. Teams costs $40 per full developer seat with an $80 monthly minimum, and includes an admin dashboard, analytics and centralized billing for up to 200 users.

Cost Scenarios

A solo developer who already pays for ChatGPT Plus. Codex adds nothing to the bill, including cloud tasks and GitHub review. Adding Devin Desktop Pro costs another $20 a month; Devin Desktop Free is enough to test whether its IDE and unlimited Tab completions are worth that.

A developer who wants one tool for editing and agents. Devin Desktop Pro at $20 covers the IDE, Devin Local, Devin Cloud and frontier models from several vendors, with extra usage at API prices. The same person on Codex would still need an editor, and Codex Plus costs the same $20.

A 20-developer team. Devin Desktop Teams costs 20 × $40 = $800 a month, well past the $80 minimum. ChatGPT Business costs 20 × $25 = $500 month-to-month, or $400 billed annually, and includes Codex plus the rest of ChatGPT. Devin's price includes the IDE and agent platform for every seat; ChatGPT Business includes the wider assistant. Teams that already run ChatGPT Business may add Devin Desktop only for the engineers who want its editor.

Heavy agent users. Codex's Pro tiers at $100, $200 and $500 currently have no five-hour limit, and Devin Desktop Max at $200 offers significantly higher quotas than Pro. At that level, compare with a two-week trial on real work, because both vendors describe usage in quotas rather than fixed task counts.

Whichever you pick, watch the model mix. On Codex, routing routine tasks to GPT-6.1 Sol instead of GPT-6 Astra is the main way to stretch an allowance. On Devin Desktop, Cognition recommends smaller models for routine tasks, and Pro's free use of SWE-2 makes it a cheap default for everyday agent work.

Codex for assigning tasks and PR review; Devin Desktop for a full AI IDE and supervising several agents

If your main requirement is…

Start with

Why

Assigning tasks and reviewing diffs

Codex

Agent-first loop across local, worktree and cloud

GitHub PR review on a personal plan

Codex

Included from ChatGPT Plus

An existing ChatGPT subscription

Codex

Codex is already included from Free upward

A full AI IDE with unlimited completions

Devin Desktop

Tab and inline edits are unlimited on every plan

Models from several vendors in one editor

Devin Desktop

Pro includes OpenAI, Anthropic, Google and other models

Supervising several agents at once

Devin Desktop

Agent Command Center with ACP support, including Codex

Cheapest routine agent work on OpenAI models

Codex

GPT-6.1 Sol at 50/2.5/250 credits per million tokens

Using Both Together

Because Devin Desktop supports ACP, a team can keep Devin Desktop as the editor and run Codex as one of its agents, while also using Codex Cloud and GitHub review from a ChatGPT plan. That split is sensible when developers like the IDE but the organization already standardizes on OpenAI models for agent work.

To decide, run the same two tasks in each product on one repository: a bug fix with a failing test, and a small feature that touches several files. Record setup time, retries, review effort, test results and the usage shown in each dashboard. Choose Codex if assigning and reviewing work is the bottleneck, and Devin Desktop if the editor and agent supervision are.

Existing Windsurf users already have Devin Desktop: it arrived as an over-the-air update that kept each account's plan, pricing, settings and extensions, though Cascade memories and workflows had to become skills when Cascade was removed. The main decision is whether to keep paying for the IDE, add Codex, or run both through ACP. Revisit the choice if Pro's free SWE-2 use ends, because routine-task costs on Devin Desktop would change then.

Official sources

Editorial guidance grounded in official product sources.

FAQ

Codex vs Devin Desktop FAQ

Is Codex or Devin Desktop better for autonomous coding work?

Codex is the stronger default for autonomous coding work because it is designed to take repository tasks through planning, editing, command execution, diff review, cloud delegation, and code review. Devin Desktop can delegate cloud work to Devin Cloud, but its strongest everyday surface is still the IDE.

When should a developer choose Devin Desktop over Codex?

Choose Devin Desktop when the main goal is a better daily editor: unlimited Tab completions, inline edits, the Devin Local agent, terminal help, previews and models from several vendors inside one IDE. It is the better fit when the editor experience is the product being bought.

Which product is better for large repositories?

It depends on the task shape. Devin Desktop has a strong IDE-native context story with indexed codebases, RAG-style retrieval, pinned context, and Fast Context. Codex is stronger when large-repo context must turn into an autonomous, tested, reviewable change set across worktrees or cloud tasks.

How should teams compare Codex and Devin Desktop pricing?

Compare the unit that will constrain real work. Codex is tied to ChatGPT plans, credits, token use, models, speed, cloud tasks, and API-key usage. Devin Desktop has clearer editor-seat plans, but quota, token use, model selection, extra usage, and Devin sessions can still change the real cost.

Can Codex and Devin Desktop be used together?

Yes. A team can use Devin Desktop as the daily IDE while using Codex for independent repo tasks, code review, or cloud delegation. The decision is not whether they can coexist; it is which product should be the default purchase and workflow owner.

Keep going

Check each product's profile, pricing and alternatives before you commit.

codex

Codex

OpenAI’s software engineering agent with GPT-6 Astra, GPT-6.1 Sol workhorse integration, and terminal workflows.

ChatGPT plan access
From $8/mo

Last verified October 19, 2026

Devin Desktop

Devin Desktop

Cognition's agentic IDE for local and cloud coding workflows.

Devin Desktop Pro
From $20/mo

Last verified October 19, 2026

Share this comparison