PricingAI Image Generators

GPT Image 2 Pricing

GPT Image 2 pricing is usage-based in the API, with separate ChatGPT plan access for end users who want the same broader image stack inside chat.

What matters before you compare plans

Start with the entry plan, then compare usage ceilings before you move into higher-spend tiers.

Pricing checked April 22, 2026

Plan matrix

Pricing breakdown

Compare entry price, billing cadence, and feature access before you commit to annual spend or a higher tier.

Plans listed

1

Closest starting point

Not specified

GPT Image 2 API

Contact for pricing

Usage: Pay-as-you-go: text input $5 per 1M tokens, cached text input $1.25 per 1M tokens, text output $10 per 1M tokens; image input $8 per 1M tokens, cached image input $2 per 1M tokens; image output $30 per 1M tokens; common square output approx $0.006 per image (low), $0.053 per image (medium), $0.211 per image (high)

  • Text-to-image generation and edits
  • High-fidelity image inputs and reference-driven workflows
  • Flexible sizes up to 4K-class outputs

Free plan

No

Trial

No trial listed

Billing unit

Usage based

Pricing checked

April 22, 2026

Editorial pricing notes

Pricing notes

Official plan caveats, contract details, and feature access notes that do not fit into the summary cards above.

Two pricing tracks

At the core, GPT Image 2 is priced as an API model. The named API model is gpt-image-2, while chatgpt-image-latest is the moving alias that tracks the snapshot currently used inside ChatGPT. Separately, OpenAI also gives end users access to the broader image stack through ChatGPT plans, which is the consumer surface many readers call ChatGPT Images 2.0 or ImageGen 2.0 in ChatGPT.

ChatGPT plan pricing

Plan

Price

What you get for images

Free

$0/mo

Limited and slower image generation in ChatGPT.

Go

$8/mo (U.S.)

More image creation with higher basic limits.

Plus

$20/mo

More complex and accurate image creation with higher limits.

Pro

$200/mo

Unlimited and faster image creation for heavy daily use.

Business

$30/user/mo monthly or $25/user/mo billed annually

Team workspace, admin controls, and business access to ChatGPT image creation.

Enterprise

Contact sales

Custom pricing for larger organizations.

For most solo creators, Go is the cheapest paid entry point and Plus is the cleaner serious-creator tier. Pro only makes sense if image generation is a daily, high-volume part of your work. Business matters once you need shared workspaces, admin controls, or procurement-friendly billing.

API pricing for gpt-image-2

OpenAI prices GPT Image 2 as usage, not a flat subscription. The official API pricing page lists text and image token rates, while the image generation guide publishes approximate common-size output costs.

Meter

Price

Text input

$5.00 / 1M tokens

Cached text input

$1.25 / 1M tokens

Text output

$10.00 / 1M tokens

Image input

$8.00 / 1M tokens

Cached image input

$2.00 / 1M tokens

Image output

$30.00 / 1M tokens

Quality

1024x1024

1024x1536

1536x1024

Low

$0.006

$0.005

$0.005

Medium

$0.053

$0.041

$0.041

High

$0.211

$0.165

$0.165

GPT Image 2 also supports flexible sizes, with popular presets reaching 2K and 4K. That makes the API track better suited to product features, batch creative operations, or teams that want fine control over size, quality, and editing inputs.

What about chatgpt-image-latest?

chatgpt-image-latest is the API alias that tracks the image snapshot used inside ChatGPT. OpenAI currently lists it separately from gpt-image-2, so developers who want the newest flagship API model should price gpt-image-2, while teams trying to mirror ChatGPT image behavior should review the chatgpt-image-latest model page before shipping.

Best value by use case

Use ChatGPT Go or Plus if you mainly create images for yourself, your team, or client work inside a chat interface.

Use the API if you need product integration, predictable rendering settings, automated edits, or large-volume generation. That is where GPT Image 2's newer API pricing and flexible sizes matter most.

Decision archive

Price history snapshots

Track how GPT Image 2 pricing has moved over time, including plan lineup shifts, free access changes, and starting price updates.

1 archived snapshot
LatestPaid · Usage based

Last confirmed

April 22, 2026

Earliest archived snapshot.

View source page

Starting price

$0.01

Access model

Paid access only

Plan count

1

Billing unit

Usage based

GPT Image 2 API

api-gpt-image-2

Monthly: Not listed

Annual: Not listed

Usage: Pay-as-you-go: text input $5 per 1M tokens, cached text input $1.25 per 1M tokens, text output $10 per 1M tokens; image input $8 per 1M tokens, cached image input $2 per 1M tokens, image output $30 per 1M tokens; 1024x1024 output approx $0.006 per image (low), $0.053 per image (medium), $0.211 per image (high)

GPT Image 2 pricing FAQ

Is GPT Image 2 the same thing as ChatGPT Images 2.0?

Not exactly. ChatGPT Images 2.0 is the consumer experience inside ChatGPT, while GPT Image 2 is the current versioned API model label. `chatgpt-image-latest` is the API alias that tracks the ChatGPT snapshot.

What is GPT Image 2 best at?

It is strongest when the image needs to communicate something precise: posters, infographics, multilingual layouts, product mockups, diagram-like explainers, and reference-image edits that need tight prompt adherence.

When should I pick Midjourney, Ideogram, Adobe Firefly, or Recraft instead?

Pick Midjourney for aesthetic-first art, Ideogram for typography-first posters or logos, Adobe Firefly for Adobe-native branded workflows, and Recraft for vector-first brand asset production.

Does GPT Image 2 support reference-image editing?

Yes. OpenAI positions the family around generation plus editing, and the current GPT Image 2 API supports high-fidelity image inputs for reference-driven edits and iterative revisions.

How does pricing work?

At the core, GPT Image 2 uses usage-based API pricing. ChatGPT plans can give end users image access in the app, but those subscriptions are separate from API billing and do not include API credits.

Internal links

What to open next

Keep researching GPT Image 2

Pair the pricing snapshot with verdict, alternatives, and the full profile page.

Head-to-head pages

Open direct comparison pages before choosing a plan.

VSGPT Image 2 vs Leonardo AIGPT Image is the better default because it pairs strong text handling, direct editing, and clearer API economics in a tighter product. Leonardo AI remains the better choice when breadth, visual control, and multi-model workflow matter more than simplicity.VSGPT Image 2 vs Nano BananaChoose GPT Image if you want the safer all-around buying decision for production work. It is the stronger default for text-heavy asset creation, clearer product-plus-API coverage, and documented output controls. Choose Nano Banana when conversational editing speed inside Gemini matters more than broader production coverage.VSGPT Image 2 vs RecraftGPT Image is the better default for most buyers because it covers the broader everyday workload: fast social assets, campaign visuals, product comps, and repeated prompt-driven edits. Recraft remains the stronger specialist when editable vectors, reusable style systems, and downstream design handoff are the real priority.VSGPT Image 2 vs Adobe FireflyGPT Image is the better default because the core experience is stronger where most buyers feel the difference: prompt fidelity, text-heavy assets, conversational iteration, and flexible access across ChatGPT and the API. Adobe Firefly is still the right stay-with-it option for Adobe-native teams that prioritize governed brand workflows, Content Credentials, and Photoshop-centered finishing.VSGPT Image 2 vs IdeogramGPT Image is the better default for typography-heavy buyers because it combines multilingual text rendering, chat-native iteration, and stronger brief understanding, while Ideogram remains the better specialist for direct type and layout control.VSGPT Image 2 vs MidjourneyGPT Image is the better default for buyers producing posters, infographics, ads, and other edit-heavy assets because it handles instructions, text, and reference-led revisions better. Midjourney remains the better niche choice for pure aesthetic exploration and style-led concept art.