Model comparisons
Gemini 4 Argon vs GPT-6 Astra: Benchmarks, API Price Gap and App Access
Gemini 4 Argon leads GPT-6 Astra on 14 of 19 rows in Google's model-card table, including knowledge work and long context; Astra leads on FrontierSWE, terminal science work and OSWorld. Astra costs $10/$50 per 1M tokens, Argon $2/$10 through November 30, 2026, then $4/$20.
Updated
In short
Choose Gemini 4 Argon for document-heavy knowledge work, inputs of 256K to 1M tokens, video, and any high-volume job; choose GPT-6 Astra for FrontierSWE-style software engineering, terminal-based science work and OSWorld-style desktop control. That split follows Google's Argon model card, the main published comparison of the two. The price gap is wide: Astra's API costs $10 per million input tokens and $50 per million output tokens, while Argon costs $2 and $10 through November 30, 2026 and $4 and $20 from December 1. At standard rates Astra is five times Argon's price now and 2.5 times after the increase, and more above 272K input tokens, where Astra's rates rise and Argon's do not.
On this page6
Astra lists at five times Argon's price until November 30, 2.5 times after
The rates below come from Google's Gemini API pricing page and OpenAI's API pricing page, per million tokens. Astra's column does not change on December 1; Argon's doubles.
Per 1M tokens | Gemini 4 Argon, to Nov 30, 2026 | Gemini 4 Argon, from Dec 1, 2026 | GPT-6 Astra |
|---|---|---|---|
Input | $2 | $4 | $10 |
Output (Argon: thinking tokens included) | $10 | $20 | $50 |
Input / output above 272K input tokens | $2 / $10 | $4 / $20 | $20 / $75 |
Cached input | $0.10 | $0.20 | $1 |
Cache writes | none listed (implicit caching only) | none listed | $12.50 for 30 minutes, $25 for 12 hours |
Batch input / output | $1 / $5 | $2 / $10 | $5 / $25 |
Flex input / output | $1 / $5 | $2 / $10 | $5 / $25 |
Priority (Argon) / Fast (Astra) | $3.60 / $18 | $7.20 / $36 | $20 / $100 |
Ultrafast | none listed | none listed | $60 / $300 |
Read the long-prompt row first if you send big contexts. OpenAI prices a whole Astra request at twice the input and cache rates and 1.5 times the output rate once the prompt passes 272K input tokens, while Google charges Argon one rate across its 1,048,576-token window. On a 500K-token prompt, input costs $20 per million on Astra against $2 on Argon in November and $4 from December.
Caching points the same way. Argon caches implicitly at 95% off input, with no explicit cache control and no write fee listed; Astra's cache hits cost $1 per million, and OpenAI charges for every cache write. OpenAI's Fast mode gives up to twice Standard speed at twice the price, and Ultrafast costs six times Standard.
An illustrative month: 40 million tokens in, 4 million out
ToolColumn arithmetic, at standard rates for prompts under 272K tokens, with no caching and the same token counts on both models. In practice each model spends its own number of thinking tokens, and Argon bills them as output.
Route | Input cost | Output cost | Month |
|---|---|---|---|
Gemini 4 Argon, November rates | $80 | $40 | $120 |
Gemini 4 Argon, December rates | $160 | $80 | $240 |
GPT-6 Astra, Standard | $400 | $200 | $600 |
GPT-6 Astra, Batch or Flex | $200 | $100 | $300 |
Even at half price through Batch or Flex, Astra costs more than Argon at its full December rate ($300 against $240). Argon's own batch rate would bring its December month to $120.
Google's model card: Argon ahead on 14 rows, Astra on 4
Google's Gemini 4 Argon model card ("results as of October, 2026") is the main table on this page because it was published with Argon and gives both models a result on 19 benchmarks. Argon leads 14, Astra leads 4, and one is tied. Every figure below is Google's.
Google's category | Benchmark | Gemini 4 Argon | GPT-6 Astra |
|---|---|---|---|
Knowledge work | Vals Index | 68.9% | 63.1% |
Knowledge work | AutomationBench | 51.3% | 41.4% |
Knowledge work | Vals Finance Agent v2 | 65.4% | 53.5% |
Knowledge work | Harvey's Legal Agent Benchmark | 19.6% | 5.4% |
Agentic coding | DeepSWE v1.1 | 77.9% | 74.1% |
Agentic coding | FrontierSWE v2 | 55.0% | 65.5% |
Agentic coding | Vibe Code Bench | 91.9% | 89.6% |
Agentic coding | Terminal-bench 4.0 | 57.4% | 58.2% |
ML engineering | PostTrainBench | 45.3% | 44.3% |
Science and math | Terminal-Bench Science 0.1 | 57.6% | 68.1% |
Science and math | LABBench 2 | 88.8% | 85.4% |
Science and math | RiemannBench | 76.0% | 72.0% |
Long context | GraphWalks up to 128K, BFS (F1) | 99.7% | 98.7% |
Long context | GraphWalks 256K to 1M, BFS (F1) | 84.2% | 71.8% |
Computer use | Agent's Last Exam (pass rate) | 39.5% | 34.2% |
Computer use | OSWorld-2.0 (offline subset, partial score) | 69.2% | 72.6% |
Multimodal understanding | Chartography | 71.6% | 71.0% |
Multimodal understanding | LVBench | 91.7% | 87.5% |
Cybersecurity | CWE-bench v1 | 68.0% | 68.0% |
Astra's four leads are FrontierSWE v2 and Terminal-Bench Science 0.1 (10.5 points each), OSWorld-2.0 (3.4 points) and Terminal-bench 4.0 (0.8 points). Argon's widest leads are on legal, finance and office automation and on the longest inputs: Harvey's Legal Agent Benchmark (19.6% vs 5.4%), GraphWalks at 256K to 1M tokens (84.2% vs 71.8%), Vals Finance Agent v2 (65.4% vs 53.5%) and AutomationBench (51.3% vs 41.4%). Coding splits: Argon is ahead on DeepSWE v1.1 and Vibe Code Bench, Astra on FrontierSWE v2.
Google's newer product-page table puts Astra ahead on 10 of 17 rows
Google's Gemini product page now carries a second table, from the October 28, 2026 launch of Gemini 4 Carbon, a model Google has so far opened only to a subset of cyber defenders. It uses different benchmark versions, some rows are Artificial Analysis runs, and Google's methodology says non-Gemini figures are the providers' self-reported numbers unless noted. On its 17 rows Astra is ahead of Argon on 10, Argon on 6, with one tie. Astra's leads there include the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index v5.0 (57 vs 50), OSWorld-2.1 (80.9% vs 74.7%), SWE-sweep (9.5% vs 4.3%) and Vending-Bench 2 ($15,515 vs $13,718 final bank balance).
The count changes mainly because the two tables pick different benchmarks, not because they disagree. Where both tables carry a benchmark, they point the same way, with one exception: Agents' Last Exam, where Argon leads on the model card's pass rate (39.5% vs 34.2%) and Astra on the product page's version 1.1 (73.1% vs 69.0%). This page does not mix figures from the two tables.
OpenAI publishes no Argon comparison, and its Astra figures differ from Google's
OpenAI's Astra launch post (September 3, 2026) predates Argon, and its only Google column is Gemini 3.8 Flash; OpenAI has published no comparison with Argon since. Where OpenAI and Google both report Astra on a benchmark of the same name, the figures do not always match.
Astra on | OpenAI | Google model card | Google product page |
|---|---|---|---|
Terminal-Bench Science 0.1 | 64.6% (Astra post); 68.1% (later GPT-6.1 Sol post) | 68.1% | 63.3% (Artificial Analysis run) |
Agents' Last Exam | 59.3% | 34.2% (pass rate) | 73.1% (v1.1) |
Terminal-Bench 4.0 | 57.9% | 58.2% | 59.1% (Artificial Analysis run) |
OSWorld | 72.6% (2.0, offline, partial) | 72.6% (2.0) | 80.9% (2.1) |
Read each column as the figure that publisher prints: Google's Carbon methodology says its non-Gemini scores are the providers' self-reported numbers unless noted, and the "(AA)" rows are Artificial Analysis runs. OpenAI's footer says its scores are the maximum at any effort; neither vendor explains the other gaps. Astra's 0.8-point lead on Terminal-bench 4.0 in Google's card is smaller than the 1.2-point spread between published Astra figures for that benchmark, so ToolColumn reads that row as level.
Astra writes 128K tokens per request; Argon's long decode runs to 1M
Both models read about a million tokens. The differences sit on the output side and in how you set reasoning.
| Gemini 4 Argon | GPT-6 Astra |
|---|---|---|
Context window | 1,048,576 tokens, shared by input and output | 1,050,000 tokens, up to 922,000 of them input |
Output per request | 65,536 tokens on the model page (32,768 non-streaming in Google's latest-model guide) | 128,000 tokens |
Longer output | long decode, up to 1M tokens minus the input | no; 128,000 is the maximum |
Knowledge cutoff | March 2026 | April 30, 2026 |
Reasoning setting | thinking levels low, medium (default), high | reasoning effort low, medium, high, xhigh, max |
Input / output | text, images, video, audio, PDF / text | text, images / text |
For one long answer under 128K tokens, Astra needs no special handling; for anything longer, such as a full translation of a book-length document, only Argon's long decode goes further. Argon also takes video and audio directly, which Astra does not. OpenAI's Astra model page and latest-model guide do not state Astra's default effort, so set it explicitly when you compare costs.
Plus gets Astra only in Work and Codex; AI Pro puts Argon in the Gemini app
The two cheapest app plans buy different things. ChatGPT Plus at $20 a month gives you Astra for agentic tasks in Work and Codex but not for chatting, while Google AI Pro at $19.99 a month puts Argon in the Gemini app itself.
- ChatGPT: Plus includes GPT-6 Astra in Work and Codex, where OpenAI's help center estimates 5–45 local Astra messages per 5-hour window on Plus and Standard Business seats, as estimates rather than guaranteed counts. In Chat, Astra runs only as GPT-6 Pro, on eligible Pro, Business and Enterprise plans. Pro 100, Pro 200 and Pro 500 currently have no five-hour limit in Work and Codex, and among Plus, Pro and Business, only Pro 500 includes Astra Ultrafast at launch. Enterprise administrators enable Astra for their workspace; it was off by default at launch.
- Gemini app: Google AI Pro ($19.99 a month) and AI Ultra ($99.99 or $199.99) include Argon in the Gemini app and in AI Mode in Search, in select countries. AI Plus gets the Flash model and accounts without a plan get Flash-Lite. Google publishes no Argon message count; app limits are compute-based and refresh every 5 hours up to a weekly limit.
- API: Astra is
gpt-6-astraon the OpenAI API (Responses, Chat Completions and Batch) and through Microsoft Azure and Amazon Bedrock. Argon isgemini-4-argon, a stable model on the paid tier of the Gemini API only, and on Google Cloud's Gemini platform. - Coding agents: Astra runs in Codex on the ChatGPT plans above. Argon runs in Google Antigravity, on AI Ultra according to Google's launch post and on AI Pro and Ultra according to the Antigravity blog.
Edited byRick Finch
Official sources
Editorial guidance grounded in official product sources.
- Gemini 4 Argon model card (Google DeepMind)
- Gemini models and benchmarks (Google DeepMind)
- Gemini Developer API pricing
- Gemini 4 Argon model page (Gemini API)
- Gemini API guide to the latest model
- Introducing Gemini 4 Argon (Google, October 13, 2026)
- Introducing Gemini 4 Carbon (Google, October 28, 2026)
- Gemini 4 Argon in Google Antigravity
FAQ
Common questions
Gemini 4 Argon vs GPT-6 Astra, which is better?
It depends on the work. In Google's Argon model card, Argon leads 14 of 19 benchmarks, including AutomationBench (51.3% vs 41.4%) and GraphWalks at 256K to 1M tokens (84.2% vs 71.8%), while Astra leads FrontierSWE v2 (65.5% vs 55.0%) and Terminal-Bench Science 0.1 (68.1% vs 57.6%). OpenAI has published no comparison with Argon.
Is GPT-6 Astra more expensive than Gemini 4 Argon?
Yes. Astra's API costs $10 per 1M input tokens and $50 per 1M output tokens, against Argon's $2 and $10 through November 30, 2026 and $4 and $20 from December 1. That makes Astra five times Argon's standard price now and 2.5 times after the increase, for prompts up to 272K tokens.
How much does Gemini 4 Argon cost?
In the API, gemini-4-argon costs $2 per 1M input tokens and $10 per 1M output tokens, thinking tokens included, through November 30, 2026, then $4 and $20; it has no free tier. In the Gemini app, Argon comes with Google AI Pro at $19.99 a month or AI Ultra.
How much does GPT-6 Astra cost?
In the API, gpt-6-astra costs $10 per 1M input tokens and $50 per 1M output tokens, rising to $20 and $75 when a prompt exceeds 272K input tokens; Batch and Flex are half price. In ChatGPT, Plus at $20 a month includes Astra in Work and Codex only.
Gemini 4 Argon vs GPT-6, which GPT-6 model does Google compare?
Google's two benchmark tables that include Argon, its model card and the Gemini 4 Carbon launch table on the Gemini product page, include GPT-6 Astra, OpenAI's flagship, as their only OpenAI model. Neither table includes GPT-6.1 Sol or GPT-6 Luna.
Can I use GPT-6 Astra and Gemini 4 Argon in the apps?
Gemini 4 Argon is in the Gemini app on Google AI Pro and Ultra. GPT-6 Astra is in ChatGPT Work and Codex from Plus upward, and in Chat only as GPT-6 Pro on Pro, Business and Enterprise plans.
Next steps
Open both sides of the distinction
- Tool profileSee Gemini plans with ArgonSee which Google AI plan includes Argon, how Gemini app limits work and Argon's API rates before and after December 1.
- GuideGemini 4 Argon vs Claude Opus 5.5: Price, Benchmarks and Which to UseCompare Argon with Claude Opus 5.5, which matches Argon's December price and leads it on terminal coding in Google's model card.
- GuideClaude Opus 5.5 vs GPT-6 Astra: Frontier Intelligence ComparedIf Astra's coding leads are why you are considering it, see how it compares with Claude Opus 5.5 at a lower token price.