Model comparisons

Gemini 4 Argon vs GPT-6 Astra: Benchmarks, API Price Gap and App Access

Gemini 4 Argon leads GPT-6 Astra on 14 of 19 rows in Google's model-card table, including knowledge work and long context; Astra leads on FrontierSWE, terminal science work and OSWorld. Astra costs $10/$50 per 1M tokens, Argon $2/$10 through November 30, 2026, then $4/$20.

Updated

In short

Choose Gemini 4 Argon for document-heavy knowledge work, inputs of 256K to 1M tokens, video, and any high-volume job; choose GPT-6 Astra for FrontierSWE-style software engineering, terminal-based science work and OSWorld-style desktop control. That split follows Google's Argon model card, the main published comparison of the two. The price gap is wide: Astra's API costs $10 per million input tokens and $50 per million output tokens, while Argon costs $2 and $10 through November 30, 2026 and $4 and $20 from December 1. At standard rates Astra is five times Argon's price now and 2.5 times after the increase, and more above 272K input tokens, where Astra's rates rise and Argon's do not.

On this page6

Astra lists at five times Argon's price until November 30, 2.5 times after

The rates below come from Google's Gemini API pricing page and OpenAI's API pricing page, per million tokens. Astra's column does not change on December 1; Argon's doubles.

Per 1M tokens

Gemini 4 Argon, to Nov 30, 2026

Gemini 4 Argon, from Dec 1, 2026

GPT-6 Astra

Input

$2

$4

$10

Output (Argon: thinking tokens included)

$10

$20

$50

Input / output above 272K input tokens

$2 / $10

$4 / $20

$20 / $75

Cached input

$0.10

$0.20

$1

Cache writes

none listed (implicit caching only)

none listed

$12.50 for 30 minutes, $25 for 12 hours

Batch input / output

$1 / $5

$2 / $10

$5 / $25

Flex input / output

$1 / $5

$2 / $10

$5 / $25

Priority (Argon) / Fast (Astra)

$3.60 / $18

$7.20 / $36

$20 / $100

Ultrafast

none listed

none listed

$60 / $300

Read the long-prompt row first if you send big contexts. OpenAI prices a whole Astra request at twice the input and cache rates and 1.5 times the output rate once the prompt passes 272K input tokens, while Google charges Argon one rate across its 1,048,576-token window. On a 500K-token prompt, input costs $20 per million on Astra against $2 on Argon in November and $4 from December.

Caching points the same way. Argon caches implicitly at 95% off input, with no explicit cache control and no write fee listed; Astra's cache hits cost $1 per million, and OpenAI charges for every cache write. OpenAI's Fast mode gives up to twice Standard speed at twice the price, and Ultrafast costs six times Standard.

An illustrative month: 40 million tokens in, 4 million out

ToolColumn arithmetic, at standard rates for prompts under 272K tokens, with no caching and the same token counts on both models. In practice each model spends its own number of thinking tokens, and Argon bills them as output.

Route

Input cost

Output cost

Month

Gemini 4 Argon, November rates

$80

$40

$120

Gemini 4 Argon, December rates

$160

$80

$240

GPT-6 Astra, Standard

$400

$200

$600

GPT-6 Astra, Batch or Flex

$200

$100

$300

Even at half price through Batch or Flex, Astra costs more than Argon at its full December rate ($300 against $240). Argon's own batch rate would bring its December month to $120.

Google's model card: Argon ahead on 14 rows, Astra on 4

Google's Gemini 4 Argon model card ("results as of October, 2026") is the main table on this page because it was published with Argon and gives both models a result on 19 benchmarks. Argon leads 14, Astra leads 4, and one is tied. Every figure below is Google's.

Google's category

Benchmark

Gemini 4 Argon

GPT-6 Astra

Knowledge work

Vals Index

68.9%

63.1%

Knowledge work

AutomationBench

51.3%

41.4%

Knowledge work

Vals Finance Agent v2

65.4%

53.5%

Knowledge work

Harvey's Legal Agent Benchmark

19.6%

5.4%

Agentic coding

DeepSWE v1.1

77.9%

74.1%

Agentic coding

FrontierSWE v2

55.0%

65.5%

Agentic coding

Vibe Code Bench

91.9%

89.6%

Agentic coding

Terminal-bench 4.0

57.4%

58.2%

ML engineering

PostTrainBench

45.3%

44.3%

Science and math

Terminal-Bench Science 0.1

57.6%

68.1%

Science and math

LABBench 2

88.8%

85.4%

Science and math

RiemannBench

76.0%

72.0%

Long context

GraphWalks up to 128K, BFS (F1)

99.7%

98.7%

Long context

GraphWalks 256K to 1M, BFS (F1)

84.2%

71.8%

Computer use

Agent's Last Exam (pass rate)

39.5%

34.2%

Computer use

OSWorld-2.0 (offline subset, partial score)

69.2%

72.6%

Multimodal understanding

Chartography

71.6%

71.0%

Multimodal understanding

LVBench

91.7%

87.5%

Cybersecurity

CWE-bench v1

68.0%

68.0%

Astra's four leads are FrontierSWE v2 and Terminal-Bench Science 0.1 (10.5 points each), OSWorld-2.0 (3.4 points) and Terminal-bench 4.0 (0.8 points). Argon's widest leads are on legal, finance and office automation and on the longest inputs: Harvey's Legal Agent Benchmark (19.6% vs 5.4%), GraphWalks at 256K to 1M tokens (84.2% vs 71.8%), Vals Finance Agent v2 (65.4% vs 53.5%) and AutomationBench (51.3% vs 41.4%). Coding splits: Argon is ahead on DeepSWE v1.1 and Vibe Code Bench, Astra on FrontierSWE v2.

Google's newer product-page table puts Astra ahead on 10 of 17 rows

Google's Gemini product page now carries a second table, from the October 28, 2026 launch of Gemini 4 Carbon, a model Google has so far opened only to a subset of cyber defenders. It uses different benchmark versions, some rows are Artificial Analysis runs, and Google's methodology says non-Gemini figures are the providers' self-reported numbers unless noted. On its 17 rows Astra is ahead of Argon on 10, Argon on 6, with one tie. Astra's leads there include the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index v5.0 (57 vs 50), OSWorld-2.1 (80.9% vs 74.7%), SWE-sweep (9.5% vs 4.3%) and Vending-Bench 2 ($15,515 vs $13,718 final bank balance).

The count changes mainly because the two tables pick different benchmarks, not because they disagree. Where both tables carry a benchmark, they point the same way, with one exception: Agents' Last Exam, where Argon leads on the model card's pass rate (39.5% vs 34.2%) and Astra on the product page's version 1.1 (73.1% vs 69.0%). This page does not mix figures from the two tables.

OpenAI publishes no Argon comparison, and its Astra figures differ from Google's

OpenAI's Astra launch post (September 3, 2026) predates Argon, and its only Google column is Gemini 3.8 Flash; OpenAI has published no comparison with Argon since. Where OpenAI and Google both report Astra on a benchmark of the same name, the figures do not always match.

Astra on

OpenAI

Google model card

Google product page

Terminal-Bench Science 0.1

64.6% (Astra post); 68.1% (later GPT-6.1 Sol post)

68.1%

63.3% (Artificial Analysis run)

Agents' Last Exam

59.3%

34.2% (pass rate)

73.1% (v1.1)

Terminal-Bench 4.0

57.9%

58.2%

59.1% (Artificial Analysis run)

OSWorld

72.6% (2.0, offline, partial)

72.6% (2.0)

80.9% (2.1)

Read each column as the figure that publisher prints: Google's Carbon methodology says its non-Gemini scores are the providers' self-reported numbers unless noted, and the "(AA)" rows are Artificial Analysis runs. OpenAI's footer says its scores are the maximum at any effort; neither vendor explains the other gaps. Astra's 0.8-point lead on Terminal-bench 4.0 in Google's card is smaller than the 1.2-point spread between published Astra figures for that benchmark, so ToolColumn reads that row as level.

Astra writes 128K tokens per request; Argon's long decode runs to 1M

Both models read about a million tokens. The differences sit on the output side and in how you set reasoning.

Gemini 4 Argon

GPT-6 Astra

Context window

1,048,576 tokens, shared by input and output

1,050,000 tokens, up to 922,000 of them input

Output per request

65,536 tokens on the model page (32,768 non-streaming in Google's latest-model guide)

128,000 tokens

Longer output

long decode, up to 1M tokens minus the input

no; 128,000 is the maximum

Knowledge cutoff

March 2026

April 30, 2026

Reasoning setting

thinking levels low, medium (default), high

reasoning effort low, medium, high, xhigh, max

Input / output

text, images, video, audio, PDF / text

text, images / text

For one long answer under 128K tokens, Astra needs no special handling; for anything longer, such as a full translation of a book-length document, only Argon's long decode goes further. Argon also takes video and audio directly, which Astra does not. OpenAI's Astra model page and latest-model guide do not state Astra's default effort, so set it explicitly when you compare costs.

Plus gets Astra only in Work and Codex; AI Pro puts Argon in the Gemini app

The two cheapest app plans buy different things. ChatGPT Plus at $20 a month gives you Astra for agentic tasks in Work and Codex but not for chatting, while Google AI Pro at $19.99 a month puts Argon in the Gemini app itself.

  • ChatGPT: Plus includes GPT-6 Astra in Work and Codex, where OpenAI's help center estimates 5–45 local Astra messages per 5-hour window on Plus and Standard Business seats, as estimates rather than guaranteed counts. In Chat, Astra runs only as GPT-6 Pro, on eligible Pro, Business and Enterprise plans. Pro 100, Pro 200 and Pro 500 currently have no five-hour limit in Work and Codex, and among Plus, Pro and Business, only Pro 500 includes Astra Ultrafast at launch. Enterprise administrators enable Astra for their workspace; it was off by default at launch.
  • Gemini app: Google AI Pro ($19.99 a month) and AI Ultra ($99.99 or $199.99) include Argon in the Gemini app and in AI Mode in Search, in select countries. AI Plus gets the Flash model and accounts without a plan get Flash-Lite. Google publishes no Argon message count; app limits are compute-based and refresh every 5 hours up to a weekly limit.
  • API: Astra is gpt-6-astra on the OpenAI API (Responses, Chat Completions and Batch) and through Microsoft Azure and Amazon Bedrock. Argon is gemini-4-argon, a stable model on the paid tier of the Gemini API only, and on Google Cloud's Gemini platform.
  • Coding agents: Astra runs in Codex on the ChatGPT plans above. Argon runs in Google Antigravity, on AI Ultra according to Google's launch post and on AI Pro and Ultra according to the Antigravity blog.

Edited byRick Finch

Official sources

Editorial guidance grounded in official product sources.

Show all 16 sources

FAQ

Common questions

Gemini 4 Argon vs GPT-6 Astra, which is better?

It depends on the work. In Google's Argon model card, Argon leads 14 of 19 benchmarks, including AutomationBench (51.3% vs 41.4%) and GraphWalks at 256K to 1M tokens (84.2% vs 71.8%), while Astra leads FrontierSWE v2 (65.5% vs 55.0%) and Terminal-Bench Science 0.1 (68.1% vs 57.6%). OpenAI has published no comparison with Argon.

Is GPT-6 Astra more expensive than Gemini 4 Argon?

Yes. Astra's API costs $10 per 1M input tokens and $50 per 1M output tokens, against Argon's $2 and $10 through November 30, 2026 and $4 and $20 from December 1. That makes Astra five times Argon's standard price now and 2.5 times after the increase, for prompts up to 272K tokens.

How much does Gemini 4 Argon cost?

In the API, gemini-4-argon costs $2 per 1M input tokens and $10 per 1M output tokens, thinking tokens included, through November 30, 2026, then $4 and $20; it has no free tier. In the Gemini app, Argon comes with Google AI Pro at $19.99 a month or AI Ultra.

How much does GPT-6 Astra cost?

In the API, gpt-6-astra costs $10 per 1M input tokens and $50 per 1M output tokens, rising to $20 and $75 when a prompt exceeds 272K input tokens; Batch and Flex are half price. In ChatGPT, Plus at $20 a month includes Astra in Work and Codex only.

Gemini 4 Argon vs GPT-6, which GPT-6 model does Google compare?

Google's two benchmark tables that include Argon, its model card and the Gemini 4 Carbon launch table on the Gemini product page, include GPT-6 Astra, OpenAI's flagship, as their only OpenAI model. Neither table includes GPT-6.1 Sol or GPT-6 Luna.

Can I use GPT-6 Astra and Gemini 4 Argon in the apps?

Gemini 4 Argon is in the Gemini app on Google AI Pro and Ultra. GPT-6 Astra is in ChatGPT Work and Codex from Plus upward, and in Chat only as GPT-6 Pro on Pro, Business and Enterprise plans.

Next steps

Open both sides of the distinction