AI Coding Assistants

Cursor

AI code editor with agents, context-aware completion, Bugbot, and cloud workflows.

Cursor: AI code editor with agents, context-aware completion, Bugbot, and cloud workflows. Pricing: From $20/mo + usage. Best for Developers who want an AI-first editor instead of separate chat tabs and extensions and Power users who rely on multi-file refactors and codebase-aware agents.

Cursor individual plansFrom $20/moCursor TeamsFrom $40/seat/moCursor EnterpriseCustom

Free plan available

Overview

Bottom line

Cursor is an AI-native code editor that combines a familiar development environment with codebase-aware chat, autocomplete, agents, reviews, and cloud-assisted workflows. It is best for developers who want the AI assistant inside the editor where planning, file editing, terminal use, and review already happen.

The clearest fit is day-to-day product engineering: navigating a codebase, making coordinated edits, asking contextual questions, and using agents without leaving the editor. The caveat is that Cursor asks teams to accept an editor-centered workflow and a usage model that can become more complex for heavy agent work. It is not just a plugin you add without changing habits.

Use Cursor when the editor is the right control point for AI coding. Keep personal seats, team governance, model usage, and cloud-agent work as separate buying questions so the workflow gain does not hide cost or adoption friction.

Pricing

Pricing snapshot

Pricing routes

App subscriptions, API usage, team workspaces, and enterprise contracts can follow different billing paths. See the pricing guide for current plan and meter details.

App subscriptionPrimary

Cursor individual plans

From $20/mo

Individual developers buy Cursor through Hobby, Pro, Pro+, and Ultra with included agent usage. Composer 2.5 usage is metered inside Cursor's usage model at Standard/Fast token rates, so treat those rates as usage pricing rather than a base subscription change.

Team workspace

Cursor Teams

From $40/seat/mo

Team workspaces use per-seat Teams pricing with included usage, admin controls, and workspace-level usage governance. Composer 2.5 usage should be modeled as metered usage inside the allowance or overage model.

Enterprise sales

Cursor Enterprise

Custom

Enterprise usage is sold through custom contracts and pooled usage controls. Composer 2.5 usage should be scoped to the contracted usage pool rather than a separate public seat price.

Hobby

$0/mo + usage

Usage: Limited Agent requests; limited Tab completions

Pro

$20/mo + usage

Usage: $20 included agent usage + bonus usage

Teams

$40/mo + usage

Usage: $20 included usage/user/mo; 500 requests/user/mo

Pro+

$60/mo + usage

Usage: $70 included agent usage + bonus usage

Ultra

$200/mo + usage

Usage: $400 included agent usage + bonus usage

Enterprise

Custom quote or bundled pricing

Usage: Custom pooled usage

Capabilities

Input types

text, code, file

Output types

text, code, file

Supported platforms

Web, Mac, Windows, Linux

Delivery modes

Web app, Desktop app, CLI

Company context

Company

Anysphere, Inc.

Founded

Not specified

Headquarters

Not specified

Official sources

Editorial guidance grounded in official product sources.

Cursor: AI coding agentChecked July 12, 2026 UTC
Cursor · PricingChecked July 12, 2026 UTC
Cursor Docs — Agent, Rules, MCP, Skills & CLIChecked July 12, 2026 UTC

FAQ

Common questions

Is Cursor free to use?

Yes. Cursor offers a free Hobby plan with limited Agent requests and limited Tab completions, while paid plans start at $20 per month.

How is Cursor different from GitHub Copilot?

Cursor is a full AI-native editor with agents, codebase-aware chat, cloud workflows, code review, and shared rules, rather than primarily an inline completion product.

Does Cursor work for teams?

Yes. Teams starts at $40 per user per month and adds centralized billing, admin controls, privacy mode enforcement, SAML or OIDC SSO, and spending controls.

What happens when included usage runs out?

Cursor can continue through dashboard-managed on-demand billing, so heavy users should match their plan to expected agent usage and monitor consumption.

Which platforms does Cursor support?

Cursor provides desktop apps for macOS, Windows, and Linux, plus web-based agent access. It does not currently offer a native iOS or Android app.

Decision rail

Keep the key facts, primary action, and section jumps visible while you evaluate the profile.

Visit Official Site

Last verified August 24, 2026

Pricing: From $20/mo + usage
Platforms: Web, Mac, Windows, Linux
Access: Web app, Desktop app, CLI
Best for: Developers who want an AI-first editor instead of separate chat tabs and extensions and Power users who rely on multi-file refactors and codebase-aware agents and Teams that need shared rules, privacy controls, and centralized administration and Engineers who move between desktop editing and cloud-agent workflows
Category: AI Coding Assistants

On this page

Bottom line Pricing Capabilities FAQ Related tools

Pass this page along

Copy the link or send it to the channel where your team compares tools, pricing, and tradeoffs.

LinkedIn X Reddit Email

Navigation

Tool cluster

Open related pages for pricing, reviews, and adjacent coverage.

Review: Cursor ReviewCursor is one of the strongest AI coding environments available, pairing deep codebase context with agentic workflows, but its usage-based pricing makes plan selection less predictable.Pricing: Cursor Pricing 2026: Pro, Business, Usage Limits & OveragesCursor pricing is not just the monthly seat price. Compare Free, Pro, Pro+, Ultra, Teams or Business usage limits, included agent usage, admin needs, and on-demand billing before scaling.Alternatives: Best Cursor Alternatives in 2026: Windsurf, Copilot, Claude Code, and TabnineThe best Cursor alternatives split into four buyer paths: Windsurf for the closest editor-first replacement, GitHub Copilot for GitHub-standardized teams, Claude Code for terminal-heavy agents, and Tabnine for tighter admin and privacy controls.

Head-to-head

Open direct comparison pages involving this tool.

VSCursor vs GitHub CopilotCursor is better for developers who live in one editor and want the most opinionated AI coding workflow. GitHub Copilot is better for GitHub-centric teams that prioritize price, platform breadth, and built-in review and PR automation. Across the whole market, this comparison is a contextual tie rather than a single winner.VSCursor vs Claude CodeClaude Code is the better overall pick because its wins land in the highest-leverage parts of engineering work: repo-wide execution, automation, and approval-first control in your own environment. Cursor remains excellent if you want the strongest AI editor, broader model choice, and richer built-in collaboration surfaces.VSCursor vs CodexCursor is the better default for most developers because it combines an AI-native editor, broader model choice, and stronger day-to-day workflow tooling. Codex is stronger for multi-agent delegation, cross-tool reach, and direct OpenAI API usage.VSCursor vs Devin Desktop (Windsurf)Cursor is the stronger default for most buyers. Windsurf still fits better if you want a more guided editor-native workflow with previews and tighter in-editor orchestration.

Same category

Nearby tools in the same lane.

ToolGitHub CopilotGitHub-native AI coding assistant for chat, code review, and agent workflows.ToolDevin Desktop (Windsurf)Windsurf is now Devin Desktop: an agentic IDE for local and cloud coding workflows.ToolClaude CodeAnthropic’s coding agent for terminal, IDE, web, desktop, mobile, and SDK workflows ToolCodexOpenAI's coding agent with GPT-5.6 model choice, selectable reasoning, and parallel Ultra workflows.

Reference links

Official site Pricing page Documentation External changelog