Learn
GPT-6.1 Sol vs GPT-6 Sol: Should You Switch?
GPT-6.1 Sol keeps GPT-6 Sol's $2/$10 price, halves cached input to $0.10 and posts OpenAI-reported gains on coding, computer use and business workflows. Compare pricing, Codex credits, availability and when to stay on GPT-6 Sol.
Separate adjacent ideas before you evaluate them. Use this page when similar names or layers sound interchangeable but lead to different decisions.
Editorial guide
Guide
Start with the core separation before you compare workflows, pricing, or plans.
OpenAI released GPT-6.1 Sol on September 29, 2026, one week after GPT-6 Sol. It is an upgrade to the same mid-tier model rather than a new tier: the standard price stays at $2 per million input tokens and $10 per million output tokens, cached input drops from $0.20 to $0.10 per million, and OpenAI reports clear gains on coding, computer use and multi-step business work. GPT-6 Sol remains available at its unchanged price.
This guide answers one question: should you move a GPT-6 Sol workload to GPT-6.1 Sol now? If you are instead choosing between Sol and GPT-6 Astra, see the Astra comparison linked below.
The short answer
For most API and Codex workloads, switch after a short regression run. GPT-6.1 Sol costs the same or less for every request, cuts cached input in half, and OpenAI reports it ahead of GPT-6 Sol on every launch evaluation where it compares the two. Stay on GPT-6 Sol for now if your prompts and evaluations are pinned for compliance or change control, if GPT-6.1 Sol has not reached your ChatGPT workspace yet, or if the tool you use does not list GPT-6.1 Sol.
What stays the same and what changes
Detail | GPT-6.1 Sol | GPT-6 Sol |
|---|---|---|
API model ID | | |
Standard input / output (per 1M tokens) | $2 / $10 | $2 / $10 |
Cached input (per 1M tokens) | $0.10 | $0.20 |
Cache write (per 1M tokens) | $2.50 | $2.50 |
Prompts above 272K input tokens | $4 / $15 | $4 / $15 |
Batch and Flex input / output | $1 / $5 | $1 / $5 |
Fast input / output | $4 / $20 | $4 / $20 |
Codex credits per 1M tokens (input / cached / output) | 50 / 2.5 / 250 | 50 / 5 / 250 |
Context window / maximum output | 1,050,000 / 128,000 tokens | 1,050,000 / 128,000 tokens |
Ultrafast | Announced as coming soon | Not offered |
Every price except cached input is identical, so the upgrade never raises a bill at the same token counts. The saving grows with how much of each request is served from cache.
What OpenAI reports GPT-6.1 Sol improves
OpenAI's launch post compares GPT-6.1 Sol with GPT-6 Sol on several evaluations. These are OpenAI's own results, run in its research environment or through the API, not independent measurements:
- DeepSWE v1.1 (software engineering in real codebases): 6.4 percentage points above GPT-6 Sol's best result, at a lower reasoning effort and cost; OpenAI says it matches GPT-6 Astra at roughly one-fifth of the cost.
- AutomationBench 1.0.6 (multi-step business workflows): up 4.8 points from GPT-6 Sol at medium reasoning effort.
- OSWorld 2.0, offline set (computer use): 7 points above GPT-6 Sol at maximum effort for less than half the cost.
- Terminal-Bench Science 0.1 (scientific workflows): more than double GPT-6 Sol's result at maximum effort, at less than half the cost per task.
- Factuality on difficult prompts: at low reasoning effort, the share of answers with a factual error falls from 11.4% to 7.7%.
OpenAI also reports better alignment results than GPT-6 Sol, such as disclosing a broken search tool more often (failing to disclose in 2.1% of cases against 4.9%). Treat all of these as reasons to test, then confirm on your own tasks at the reasoning effort you actually ship.
What the switch costs or saves
Because only cached input changes, the saving depends on your cache hit rate. These examples use standard short-context API rates.
Workload | GPT-6 Sol | GPT-6.1 Sol | Saving |
|---|---|---|---|
Agent turn: 200K input (160K cached), 10K output | $0.212 | $0.196 | About 8% |
Long session: 1M input (95% cached), 20K output | $0.490 | $0.395 | About 19% |
Uncached request: 100K input, 10K output | $0.300 | $0.300 | None |
In Codex the same pattern holds in credits: the agent turn above uses about 5.3 credits on GPT-6 Sol and 4.9 on GPT-6.1 Sol. Workloads with little cache reuse see no price change, so their case for switching rests on the capability gains alone.
Where each model is available
GPT-6.1 Sol is available in the OpenAI API as gpt-6.1-sol. In ChatGPT, OpenAI is rolling it out in ChatGPT Work and Codex starting with Pro and expanding to Plus, Business, Enterprise and Edu; Enterprise and Edu workspace owners enable it through model permissions. It is not yet available in Chat. GPT-6 Sol stays available in the API, ChatGPT Work and Codex.
Outside OpenAI, GitHub made GPT-6.1 Sol generally available in Copilot on September 29 for Copilot Pro+, Max, Business and Enterprise, billed at list price. Other tools add models on their own schedules, so check each vendor's model list before assuming the new version is there.
How to switch safely
- Run your existing evaluation set on
gpt-6.1-solat the reasoning effort you use today, and compare accepted results, retries and total tokens rather than a single benchmark. - Keep prompts and tool definitions unchanged for the first run so any difference comes from the model.
- Check cache hit rates after switching; the upgrade only saves money where requests reuse a stable prompt prefix.
- Update model IDs in configuration, workspace defaults and automations deliberately. OpenAI has not said that GPT-6.1 Sol replaces GPT-6 Sol as a default anywhere, so do not assume an alias moved.
- Keep GPT-6 Sol as a fallback until the new model has run cleanly in production for a representative period.
Bottom line
GPT-6.1 Sol is a same-price upgrade with cheaper cache reads and OpenAI-reported gains across coding, computer use and business workflows, so most teams should plan to move. The reasons to wait are operational: pinned evaluations, a workspace that has not received the rollout, or a tool that does not list the new model yet.
Evidence boundary
Official sources
Editorial guidance grounded in official product sources.
FAQ
Common questions
Is GPT-6.1 Sol more expensive than GPT-6 Sol?
No. Both list at $2 per million input tokens and $10 per million output tokens, with the same cache-write, long-prompt, Batch, Flex and Fast rates. The only price difference is cached input: $0.10 per million on GPT-6.1 Sol against $0.20 on GPT-6 Sol.
How much better is GPT-6.1 Sol than GPT-6 Sol?
OpenAI reports GPT-6.1 Sol 6.4 percentage points above GPT-6 Sol's best DeepSWE v1.1 result, 4.8 points higher on AutomationBench at medium effort and 7 points higher on OSWorld 2.0 at maximum effort. These are OpenAI's own evaluations, so confirm the gain on your own tasks.
Is GPT-6 Sol being retired?
No retirement has been announced. GPT-6 Sol remains in OpenAI's API pricing at unchanged rates and stays available in ChatGPT Work and Codex while GPT-6.1 Sol rolls out.
Can I use GPT-6.1 Sol in ChatGPT?
In ChatGPT Work and Codex, yes, as it rolls out: Pro first, then Plus, Business, Enterprise and Edu, with Enterprise and Edu owners enabling it in model permissions. It is not yet available in Chat. Developers can call it in the API as gpt-6.1-sol.
Does GPT-6.1 Sol cost fewer Codex credits?
Only for cached input. Codex charges 50 credits per million input tokens and 250 per million output tokens on both models, while cached input costs 2.5 credits per million on GPT-6.1 Sol against 5 on GPT-6 Sol.
When should I stay on GPT-6 Sol?
Stay on GPT-6 Sol while you rerun pinned evaluations for compliance or change control, if GPT-6.1 Sol has not reached your ChatGPT workspace, or if the tool you use does not list it yet. OpenAI has not said GPT-6.1 Sol replaces GPT-6 Sol as a default, so switch model IDs deliberately.
Next steps
Open both sides of the distinction
Open the most relevant product pages or follow-up guides for each side of the distinction after the split is clear.